SC Upholds Abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir

SC Upholds Abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir
Facebook
Twitter
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Reddit
LinkedIn

In a landmark judgment on December 11, the Supreme Court of India on Monday unanimously upheld the Union government’s controversial 2019 decision to abrogate Article 370, which granted special status to Jammu and Kashmir. The five-judge bench, led by Chief Justice of India Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, termed the abrogation a “culmination of the process of integration” of Jammu and Kashmir into the Indian Union. They declared it a valid exercise of presidential power, emphasizing that Article 370 was always intended as a temporary provision.

Constitutional Orders Upheld

The judges also validated the two presidential orders issued in August 2019 that applied all provisions of the Indian Constitution to J&K and revoked Article 370. They ruled that the president didn’t need approval from the dissolved J&K constituent assembly or the state legislature before abrogating the article.

Policy Decision, Executive Action

The court maintained that the abrogation was a “policy decision” within the executive’s domain, and the government had the authority to assess whether special circumstances warranted the move. They clarified that judicial review wouldn’t extend to the president’s assessment of the existence or absence of such circumstances.

Victory for BJP

The verdict is a significant victory for the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which had made abrogation a key election promise. Prime Minister Narendra Modi hailed the judgment as a “resounding declaration of hope, progress and unity” for the people of Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh.

Two Judgments, One Consensus

While the judges unanimously agreed on the abrogation’s validity, they delivered separate judgments. CJI Chandrachud focused on the legal and constitutional aspects, while Justice Kaul urged for a “Truth and Reconciliation Commission” to address human rights violations and foster social reconciliation.

Unresolved Issues Remain

The long-term implications of the decision and the future of the newly formed Union Territories remain uncertain. However, the court’s verdict has undoubtedly opened a new chapter for Jammu and Kashmir, with the promise of elections, potential statehood, and a renewed focus on integration and reconciliation.

Facebook
Twitter
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Reddit
LinkedIn

Satyam Singh

Satyam Singh is Editor at Daily Ingest. He holds a degree in English Journalism from the Indian Institute of Mass Communication (IIMC), alongside a Bachelor's in Computer Application. He channels the enthusiasm towards sports, with a particular fondness for cricket. He encourages constructive feedback and welcomes your reviews in the comments.

Leave a Comment

Top Stories

RBI’s Initiative: Developing MuleHunter.AI to Combat Financial Fraud

RBI’s Initiative: Developing MuleHunter.AI to Combat Financial Fraud

The alarming rise in online financial fraud, as highlighted by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), underscores the urgent need for innovative solutions to protect consumers and the banking system. With online financial frauds constituting 67.8% of all cybercrime complaints in Q2 2022, and a staggering increase in reported fraud cases from 14,480 to 18,461—amounting

Read More »
Rural Empowerment through technology: a way forward or just a tax strategy?

Rural Empowerment through technology: a way forward or just a tax strategy?

Kamran Akhtar, New Delhi The SVAMITVA scheme, launched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on April 24, 2020, aims to provide a formal record of rights to rural households by issuing property cards. This initiative is designed to empower villagers by recognizing their property ownership, thereby enabling them to leverage their assets for financial benefits. The

Read More »
Dushyant Dave’s Emotional Plea: A Critical Examination of Judicial Precedents and Minority Rights in India

Dushyant Dave’s Emotional Plea: A Critical Examination of Judicial Precedents and Minority Rights in India

In a heartfelt interview with Karan Thapar for The Wire, Dushyant Dave, the former President of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), shed tears as he expressed profound concerns over India’s increasingly polarized political landscape. Central to his discourse was the role of the majority in protecting the rights of minorities and the troubling implications

Read More »