Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna, key figures of Patanjali Ayurveda, tender an apology in the Supreme Court, promising to rectify misleading advertisements and uphold legal integrity. In response to concerns over deceptive advertising, Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna submit affidavits expressing remorse and commitment to compliance with legal mandates.
Ramdev’s Pledge
Baba Ramdev acknowledges the advertising oversight, seeks forgiveness, and pledges adherence to the law. He assures non-repetition of similar violations and extends an apology for past discrepancies.
Balkrishna’s Assurance
Acharya Balkrishna affirms vigilance to prevent future misleading ads and undertakes to comply with court directives, emphasizing a proactive stance against regulatory breaches.
The Supreme Court directs fresh affidavits from Ramdev and Balkrishna, scheduling a hearing to address concerns regarding Patanjali’s advertising practices and their compliance.
Court’s Response
Expressing dissatisfaction with previous apologies, the court reprimands Patanjali for non-compliance with directives, signaling a stern approach towards violations of legal commitments.
Earlier, the court summoned Ramdev and Balkrishna for contempt proceedings, highlighting Patanjali’s failure to respond adequately to show cause notices, indicating a heightened scrutiny of corporate conduct.
Legal Framework and IMA’s Petition:
The Indian Medical Association (IMA) petitions for stringent regulations to curb misleading advertisements, urging swift legal action against Patanjali for violating relevant laws and consumer protection statutes.
Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna’s apology marks a pivotal moment in Patanjali’s legal battle, underscoring the necessity for corporate accountability and adherence to regulatory frameworks in the advertising sphere.
